koigrid vs Wasabi
S3 storage with bandwidth included and no minimum-retention traps.
Wasabi removed egress fees but added a 1 TB minimum and a 90-day minimum retention — delete early and you still pay. And it’s storage-only, not managed or agent-native.
| Feature | koigrid | Wasabi |
|---|---|---|
| Egress | Included | Free |
| Minimum retention | None | 90 days — billed even if you delete |
| Minimum storage | None | 1 TB minimum billed |
| Agent / API-native | Yes | No |
| Managed + human support | Yes | No (storage only) |
What koigrid improves
No minimums
Pay for what you use — no 1 TB floor, no 90-day lock.
Managed cloud
Not just a bucket: flat-rate managed cloud with support.
Agent-native
Drive it from your AI agent via API.
Frequently asked questions
Is koigrid cheaper than Wasabi?
koigrid is flat-rate with bandwidth included — no per-GB egress or per-request fees. For a comparable setup you usually pay a lot less (see the estimate above).
Can I migrate from Wasabi without lock-in?
Yes. koigrid runs on portable primitives — standard PostgreSQL, S3-compatible storage and containers — so you can move in (or out) whenever you want.
Where is my data hosted?
In data centers in the EU, on servers we run ourselves. The privacy policy says exactly where.
Can I run everything from an API or an AI agent?
Yes — koigrid is API-first and agent-native: every action has an API and a scoped token, with llms.txt and OpenAPI so an LLM can operate it end to end.